Commercial & small business

Commercial PPA vs. ownership

Compare the full 10-year cost of owning your system, with the ITC and depreciation counted, against a third-party PPA where the developer keeps the tax benefits in exchange for a lower electricity rate.

Your numbers

1 Your system
From your installer's proposal, or the size by square footage tool.
US commercial systems typically run $1.10 to $1.80 per watt before incentives.
Typical commercial O&M runs $15 to $25 per kW per year.
2 Ownership tax benefits
Check the ITC calculator for your exact rate with any bonus adders.
Leave blank if your state or utility doesn't offer one.
3 Third-party PPA option
Use your installer's production estimate, or the capacity factor calculator.
Commercial PPA rates typically run $0.06 to $0.12 per kWh, below the utility retail rate.
Most PPA contracts include a fixed 1% to 3% yearly rate increase.

How it works

Three steps to your PPA versus ownership answer

Step 1

Build your ownership case first

Confirm your ITC rate with the ITC calculator and your bonus depreciation with the bonus depreciation calculator if you want either number in isolation.

Step 2

Get a PPA quote from a developer

Ask for the proposed rate and escalation clause. Most commercial PPA rates start below your current utility rate and rise slowly over the contract term.

Step 3

Weigh total cost against your priorities

Ownership usually wins on pure cost, but check the loan vs. cash comparison if you don't have the cash on hand to own outright.

Understanding PPA vs. ownership for your business

Why ownership usually wins the total cost comparison

For most taxable businesses, ownership wins by a wide margin once the ITC and bonus depreciation are counted. On a $240,000 system with a $5,000 rebate, owning costs about $130,000 over 10 years including O&M, versus about $212,366 for a PPA at $0.09 per kWh with 2% annual escalation, an $82,366 advantage for ownership. The tax benefits alone often cover more than half the system's upfront cost, which a PPA rate can't fully replicate no matter how competitive it is. Before you lock in a number, compare it with PPA vs. lease comparison. A size estimate is only half the decision for a business. The loan payment calculator in our Financing section can help you work out which way to pay for the system costs less.

Why the ownership advantage is bigger here than for a nonprofit

A taxable business gets both the ITC and MACRS depreciation tax savings, while a tax-exempt entity using direct pay only gets the ITC, since depreciation has no value against a tax bill that doesn't exist. That extra depreciation benefit is what widens the ownership advantage for a for-profit business compared to a nonprofit running the same numbers. Check the MACRS depreciation calculator to see that piece broken out on its own. Run the same inputs through loan term comparison tool to cross-check this figure.

When a PPA still makes sense

A PPA can make sense if you want zero upfront cost, don't have enough tax liability to use the ITC and depreciation efficiently, or want the developer to handle all maintenance and performance risk. The old off-balance-sheet argument for a PPA is weaker than it used to be, since a PPA can itself qualify as an embedded lease under the Financial Accounting Standards Board's Topic 842 lease accounting standard if you control the system's output and the developer can't substitute a different array, in which case it lands on your balance sheet the same as a loan would. If cash flow is the constraint rather than total cost, check the loan vs. cash comparison for a middle path that still lets you claim the tax benefits.

Who actually claims the tax benefits in each structure

The developer or a third-party investor owns the system in a PPA and claims the ITC and depreciation themselves, which is part of how they're able to offer you a below-market electricity rate. You never touch those tax benefits directly, they're built into the rate you're quoted. Run the payback calculator next if you decide ownership is the right path for your business, the ITC calculator to see exactly what you'd be claiming, or the loan term comparison tool in our financing section if a loan is the ownership path you're leaning toward, and the PPA vs. lease comparison if a lease is the third-party structure you're weighing instead. The Department of Energy's guide to going solar covers these ownership and financing tradeoffs at a more general level.

Questions A commercial roof has its own costs and limits. The roof inspection cost before solar estimator in our Solar + Roofing Integration section can help you check whether your roof is ready before you commit to a size.

Frequently asked

For most taxable businesses, ownership wins by a wide margin once the ITC and bonus depreciation are counted. On a $240,000 system with a $5,000 rebate, owning costs about $130,000 over 10 years including O&M, versus about $212,366 for a PPA at $0.09 per kWh with 2% annual escalation, an $82,366 advantage for ownership.

A taxable business gets both the ITC and MACRS depreciation tax savings, while a tax-exempt entity using direct pay only gets the ITC, since depreciation has no value against a tax bill that doesn't exist. That extra depreciation benefit is what widens the ownership advantage for a for-profit business compared to a nonprofit running the same numbers.

A PPA can make sense if you want zero upfront cost, don't have enough tax liability to use the ITC and depreciation efficiently, or want the developer to handle all maintenance and performance risk. The off-balance-sheet argument for a PPA is weaker than it used to be, since a PPA can itself qualify as an embedded lease under current accounting rules and land on your balance sheet the same as a loan would.

The developer or a third-party investor owns the system in a PPA and claims the ITC and depreciation themselves, which is part of how they're able to offer you a below-market electricity rate. You never touch those tax benefits directly, they're built into the rate you're quoted.