Financing

Financing cost vs cash savings comparison

Enter your system price, loan terms, and an assumed investment return. See whether financing and investing the difference beats paying cash outright.

Your numbers

1 Project details Optional
Shown on your exported report. Leave blank to skip.
2 Your system and loan
3 Your assumed investment return
Investment returns are never guaranteed and can vary significantly year to year.

How it works

Three steps to your comparison

Step 1

Get your system price and loan terms

Use your real system cost and the APR and term you're considering. The cash purchase vs financed payback comparison covers the basic version of this tradeoff without the investment angle.

Step 2

Pick a conservative investment return

Choose an assumption you're comfortable defending, since this is the number that determines whether financing looks favorable. A lower, more conservative assumption gives a more cautious read. If your system was installed by December 31, 2025, and you have unused credit carrying forward, the carried-forward credit tool shows that narrower math on its own.

Step 3

Weigh the numbers against your own risk tolerance

Financing and investing only wins if you're actually comfortable with investment risk and disciplined about investing the difference rather than spending it.

Reading your financing vs cash opportunity cost result

The core question this tool answers

Financing costs more than cash in direct terms, since you're paying interest on top of the system price. But if the cash you'd otherwise spend upfront could earn a higher return invested elsewhere than the loan's APR costs you, financing and investing the difference can come out ahead on paper, by an even wider margin now that no tax credit reduces the amount of cash available to invest. On a $28,000 system financed at 6.99% against a 7% assumed investment return over 20 years, the investment path can outgain the financing premium by tens of thousands of dollars. The SEC's guidance on comparing investments covers general principles worth applying to this kind of decision.

Why this comparison isn't risk-free

A loan payment is a fixed, known obligation, while investment returns fluctuate and can be negative in any given year, even if the long-run average looks favorable. This tool shows a straight-line projection at your assumed rate, which smooths over real-world volatility that could matter a lot if you needed the invested money back during a down year.

Why discipline matters as much as the math

This comparison only holds up if the cash difference actually gets invested consistently rather than spent elsewhere. If there's a real chance that money would otherwise go toward other purchases, the certainty of paying cash outright and avoiding interest entirely may be the more realistic choice, even if the math favors financing on paper. The solar ROI percentage calculator can help you frame this decision in terms of a direct return figure instead.

How your loan APR changes the calculation

A lower APR makes financing and investing more attractive, since less of the investment gain gets offset by loan interest, while a higher APR narrows or eliminates the advantage. Run the loan APR impact calculator to see how sensitive your total cost is to the exact rate you're quoted. The CFPB's explainer on how loan amortization works covers the underlying mechanics of why the rate matters this much.

What a more conservative approach looks like

If investment risk isn't something you want to take on, the down payment impact calculator shows a middle path: putting some cash down to reduce interest while keeping some liquidity, without betting the full amount on market returns. The cash flow positive timeline calculator can also help you see when a full loan payment starts being covered by bill savings alone, regardless of what you do with the rest of your cash. A battery changes the loan amount. The battery charge time from solar calculator in our Battery & Storage section can help you size it before you borrow, so you do not pay interest on spare capacity.

Questions

Frequently asked

It depends on your loan APR versus your expected investment return. On a $28,000 system with a 6.99% APR loan, financing costs about $24,060 more than cash. If that same cash were invested at a 7% average annual return instead, it could grow by about $80,351 over 20 years, favoring financing and investing by a wide margin in this scenario.

A common reference is the long-run average return of a diversified stock index, often cited around 7% to 10% annually before inflation, though actual returns vary significantly year to year and aren't guaranteed. Use a conservative estimate if you want a cautious comparison, since investment returns carry real risk that a paid-off loan does not.

No, this tool shows a straight-line projection at your assumed return rate, but real investments fluctuate and can lose value in any given year, especially over shorter periods. A paid-off solar loan has no such risk once the loan term ends, which is a real consideration this calculation doesn't capture numerically.

Financing wins on paper when the money you'd have spent in cash earns more invested elsewhere than the loan's APR costs you. A 6.99% loan against an assumed 7% or higher investment return favors financing, though this requires being comfortable with investment risk and reliably investing the difference rather than spending it.