Battery chemistry & storage

Battery round trip efficiency comparison tool

Enter your daily energy throughput and electricity rate. See how much energy and money each chemistry actually wastes to inefficiency each year.

Your numbers

1 Project details Optional
Shown on your exported report. Leave blank to skip.
2 Your usage
The usable energy you pull out of the battery each day.
Adds an annual dollar cost to the results.

How it works

Three steps to compare true efficiency

Step 1

Estimate your daily energy delivered

Use the usable energy you actually pull out of the battery each day, not nameplate capacity.

Step 2

Add your electricity rate for a dollar figure

Inefficiency losses are easy to ignore as a percentage but add up in real cost over a system's lifetime.

Step 3

Check the loss sources behind the headline number

Round trip efficiency bundles several losses together. The internal resistance calculator and BMS efficiency tool break out two of the biggest contributors individually.

Understanding your efficiency comparison

What round trip efficiency actually bundles together

Round trip efficiency combines internal resistance losses during charge and discharge, BMS standby draw, cell balancing overhead, and, for some chemistries, additional parasitic loads like pumps. Rather than tracking each separately, this single percentage gives a practical shortcut for estimating total energy waste over a year of use, a figure worth folding into the savings with battery vs without battery tool for a complete picture of what a system actually saves you after these losses.

Why lithium chemistries dominate on efficiency

LFP and NMC both convert charge and discharge energy with minimal loss, typically landing in the 95% to 97% range, thanks to low internal resistance and minimal parasitic overhead, figures consistent with the efficiency benchmarks NREL's energy storage research publishes across storage chemistries. That efficiency advantage compounds daily over a system's life, adding up to real savings beyond just the purchase price covered in the lithium vs lead acid comparison.

Why lead acid and flow batteries lose more energy

Lead acid loses energy to gassing during charging, where some input energy breaks down water instead of storing charge, while flow batteries draw ongoing power to run circulation pumps regardless of how much net energy is being stored or released. Both effects are structural to how each chemistry works, not a sign of a poorly built product. See the flow battery vs lithium comparison for how that efficiency gap fits into the bigger cost picture, and the battery cost per kWh comparison tool for how a lower sticker price can still lose ground once efficiency losses are factored in.

What to check next

If a specific chemistry's efficiency loss looks concerning, the cell balancing loss calculator and internal resistance tool linked above can help pinpoint which part of that loss you might actually be able to reduce. This same efficiency accounting shows up in how the DOE's Office of Electricity evaluates real-world round trip efficiency for grid-scale storage deployments.

Questions

Frequently asked

Round trip efficiency measures how much of the energy you put into a battery comes back out usable, expressed as a percentage. A 96% round trip efficiency means you lose about 4% of every kWh charged in, mostly as heat from internal resistance and other losses.

For a 10 kWh daily cycling system at 15 cents per kWh, LFP's roughly 96% efficiency costs about $23 a year in wasted energy, while lead acid's roughly 82% efficiency costs around $120 a year for the same usage. That gap compounds every year the system operates.

Lead acid loses more energy to internal resistance and gassing during charging, where some of the input energy breaks down water in the electrolyte instead of storing charge. That combination typically puts lead acid's round trip efficiency 10 to 15 percentage points below lithium chemistries.

Flow batteries need pumps to circulate electrolyte between tanks and the reaction stack, which draws parasitic power on top of the stack's own conversion losses. That combination typically puts flow battery round trip efficiency in the 65% to 80% range, the lowest of the common storage chemistries.