Battery chemistry & storage

Battery internal resistance impact calculator

Enter your battery's voltage, capacity, and chemistry, then your load. See the voltage drop, power lost as heat, and efficiency hit from internal resistance.

Your numbers

1 Project details Optional
Shown on your exported report. Leave blank to skip.
2 Your battery
Used to estimate typical resistance if you don't have a measured value.
From a datasheet or meter reading, if you have one.
3 Your load

How it works

Three steps to check resistance losses

Step 1

Enter your battery's voltage, capacity, and chemistry

These three numbers generate a reasonable resistance estimate if you don't have a measured value handy.

Step 2

Add a measured resistance if you have one

A datasheet figure or meter reading is always more accurate than an estimate based on typical chemistry values. The round trip efficiency comparison is a good cross-check once you have both numbers.

Step 3

Check the loss at your actual load, not just a guess

Since loss rises with the square of current, check this figure at your real peak load. The C rate discharge calculator helps translate a load into the current figure driving this loss.

Understanding your internal resistance result

Where this power loss actually goes

Power lost to internal resistance doesn't disappear, it converts to heat inside the cells and connections, which is part of why battery packs need adequate airflow or cooling under sustained high loads. That heat also feeds back into faster aging, covered in more detail in the capacity over time calculator, a heat-to-aging feedback loop NREL's energy storage research studies at the cell level across chemistries.

Why the loss grows faster than the load

Because power loss follows current squared, a load that doubles doesn't just double the resistance loss, it quadruples it. This is one reason C-rate ratings exist in the first place, since pushing well past a battery's continuous rating creates disproportionate heat and voltage sag rather than a simple linear tradeoff, a heat-driven derating problem that shows up on the inverter side too, covered in the inverter noise and heat derate calculator.

Why bigger banks tend to run cooler and more efficiently

Adding parallel capacity spreads the same current across more paths, lowering the pack's overall resistance and cutting both voltage sag and heat generation at a given load. The parallel configuration calculator covers the wiring side of building that kind of larger bank, and the backup runtime estimator can show how much extra runtime that lower-loss setup actually buys you during an outage.

What to check next

If your efficiency loss looks high, the voltage sag under load calculator shows the practical effect on your equipment, and the round trip efficiency comparison puts this loss in context against a chemistry's overall efficiency. This same resistance-driven loss is part of how the DOE's Office of Electricity evaluates real-world round trip efficiency for grid-scale storage systems.

Questions

Frequently asked

For a 10 kWh LFP battery with roughly 15 milliohms of internal resistance running a 3,000-watt load, expect about 59 watts of power loss as heat, close to 2% of the load. That loss rises with the square of current, so doubling the load roughly quadruples the loss.

Power loss from resistance follows current squared, not current directly, so doubling your discharge current quadruples the heat generated rather than just doubling it. This is why high C-rate loads hurt efficiency disproportionately compared to steady, moderate draws.

Yes, generally. Combining more cells or modules in parallel reduces the pack's overall internal resistance, since resistance from parallel paths adds like resistors in parallel. A 20 kWh bank built from two paralleled 10 kWh units often has roughly half the resistance of a single 10 kWh unit.

Lead acid's chemistry and construction inherently carry more internal resistance than lithium chemistries, which is part of why lead acid runs hotter and loses more voltage under the same load. That higher resistance also contributes to lead acid's lower round-trip efficiency compared to LFP or NMC.